<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the United States Require a Strategy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262</link>
	<description>Gary Hart blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yvone Vidal</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvone Vidal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Hello i am so delighted I found your blog, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching Yahoo for something else, Anyway I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a tremendous blog posting and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I do not have time to read it all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read more,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello i am so delighted I found your blog, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching Yahoo for something else, Anyway I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a tremendous blog posting and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I do not have time to read it all at the moment but I have bookmarked it and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read more,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-111</guid>
		<description>In response to these comments, I don&#039;t think we will or probably ever should have &quot;central planning.&quot;  It is too much against the American character and system.  But that does not preclude the kind of strategic thinking that Michael (and I) advocate.  We spend tens of billions of dollars on intelligence presumably so that we will not be surprised by events, yet almost always (as with 9.11) take the necessary steps to prevent or at least reduce the likelihood of disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to these comments, I don&#8217;t think we will or probably ever should have &#8220;central planning.&#8221;  It is too much against the American character and system.  But that does not preclude the kind of strategic thinking that Michael (and I) advocate.  We spend tens of billions of dollars on intelligence presumably so that we will not be surprised by events, yet almost always (as with 9.11) take the necessary steps to prevent or at least reduce the likelihood of disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Kasey Kitterman</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Kasey Kitterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-99</guid>
		<description>The theme of my limited posts, seems similar to yours. I think your reference to the Bible is on point. I love the Constitution, but like the Bible, one can read almost anything into it. Both provide a template for reasoned action and righting wrong. My concern is for the &quot;...reaction&quot; time lost while we argue semantics. The stuff is coming down so fast, I think buckets and a strong and honest Central Government, is all that can save us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theme of my limited posts, seems similar to yours. I think your reference to the Bible is on point. I love the Constitution, but like the Bible, one can read almost anything into it. Both provide a template for reasoned action and righting wrong. My concern is for the &#8220;&#8230;reaction&#8221; time lost while we argue semantics. The stuff is coming down so fast, I think buckets and a strong and honest Central Government, is all that can save us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Coordination in and progress in one are can be subject to a setback in another. Remember when the Japanese economic coordination ministry – MITI – was going to take over the world in the 1980s? Well, I guess that got undone by the Japanese banking system. So a global approach does make the most sense. But even in a homogeneous and tightly-knit society like Japan’s, that was not possible. 

In the US, even more than our cultural history, it’s out political culture that won’t allow the kind of strategic thinking Senator Hart talking about. Just look at something as fundamental as the debate over climate change. Despite all the scientific evidence compiled by the best institutions and scientists from around the world, there are those at the highest levels of our government who still call the whole thing a hoax, or simply quote from the bible as a reason to do nothing about what is probably the greatest problem of our time. Dig a little deeper and you see that these same people are wholly-owned by the very industries that would be most affected by any change in the status quo. 

I know I’m beginning to sound like a broken record on this blog, (and I’m sure at home too) but the systemic corruption that prevents the American government from solving even the most urgent problems, like health care, in a rational way would certainly be poison to the notion any national strategy in any area. And if there was coordination with foreign governments involved, whoever proposed it would be labeled a Communist, a Fascist, a Socialist, a member of some kind of Fifth Column, the anti-Christ, a bed wetter -- well, you get the idea. Large changes are no longer possible in a system as corrupt as ours has become, no matter how much sense they might make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coordination in and progress in one are can be subject to a setback in another. Remember when the Japanese economic coordination ministry – MITI – was going to take over the world in the 1980s? Well, I guess that got undone by the Japanese banking system. So a global approach does make the most sense. But even in a homogeneous and tightly-knit society like Japan’s, that was not possible. </p>
<p>In the US, even more than our cultural history, it’s out political culture that won’t allow the kind of strategic thinking Senator Hart talking about. Just look at something as fundamental as the debate over climate change. Despite all the scientific evidence compiled by the best institutions and scientists from around the world, there are those at the highest levels of our government who still call the whole thing a hoax, or simply quote from the bible as a reason to do nothing about what is probably the greatest problem of our time. Dig a little deeper and you see that these same people are wholly-owned by the very industries that would be most affected by any change in the status quo. </p>
<p>I know I’m beginning to sound like a broken record on this blog, (and I’m sure at home too) but the systemic corruption that prevents the American government from solving even the most urgent problems, like health care, in a rational way would certainly be poison to the notion any national strategy in any area. And if there was coordination with foreign governments involved, whoever proposed it would be labeled a Communist, a Fascist, a Socialist, a member of some kind of Fifth Column, the anti-Christ, a bed wetter &#8212; well, you get the idea. Large changes are no longer possible in a system as corrupt as ours has become, no matter how much sense they might make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Kasey Kitterman</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Kasey Kitterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Wow! There is a lot there, that seems contrary to my appraisal of the American condition. I&#039;ll start with &quot;...the price paid is dependence on reaction.&quot; I suggest we suffer from a lack of reason. The ruling class has promulgated the concept of &quot;American specialness&quot; to the detriment of progress. I suggest, the Ownership Class, in an attempt to &quot;dumb down&quot; and control future &quot;60&#039;s kids&quot;, has systematically farmed out research and development to foreign lands. The price paid has been the extortion and export of American innovation and reasoned thought.
     Of course we are cultivated, to resist a strong central government. The corporate masters abhore competition. It is much easier, to have third world production of trinkets, for Homer Simpson, type consumers. What seems to have been lost in the shuffle, is the loss of middle class jobs, social mores, economic stability and a unified republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! There is a lot there, that seems contrary to my appraisal of the American condition. I&#8217;ll start with &#8220;&#8230;the price paid is dependence on reaction.&#8221; I suggest we suffer from a lack of reason. The ruling class has promulgated the concept of &#8220;American specialness&#8221; to the detriment of progress. I suggest, the Ownership Class, in an attempt to &#8220;dumb down&#8221; and control future &#8220;60&#8217;s kids&#8221;, has systematically farmed out research and development to foreign lands. The price paid has been the extortion and export of American innovation and reasoned thought.<br />
     Of course we are cultivated, to resist a strong central government. The corporate masters abhore competition. It is much easier, to have third world production of trinkets, for Homer Simpson, type consumers. What seems to have been lost in the shuffle, is the loss of middle class jobs, social mores, economic stability and a unified republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Hart: Does the United States Require a Strategy? &#124; Obama Biden White House</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Hart: Does the United States Require a Strategy? &#124; Obama Biden White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] from Senator Hart&#8217;s new blog at Matters of Principle. Share this on del.icio.usDigg this!Share this on RedditStumble upon something good? Share it on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from Senator Hart&#8217;s new blog at Matters of Principle. Share this on del.icio.usDigg this!Share this on RedditStumble upon something good? Share it on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyPattison</title>
		<link>http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262&#038;cpage=1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyPattison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattersofprinciple.com/?p=262#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Another example of our lack of strategy in stark contrast with the foresight of others is the fact that the first self-made billionaire in China is a man who started a solar panel company. Seeing what was coming the Chinese also spent the last decade or more securing the mines / mineral rights in Africa and Australia to make them the #1 importer and #1 exporter of 2/3 of the minerals that go into solar panel production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another example of our lack of strategy in stark contrast with the foresight of others is the fact that the first self-made billionaire in China is a man who started a solar panel company. Seeing what was coming the Chinese also spent the last decade or more securing the mines / mineral rights in Africa and Australia to make them the #1 importer and #1 exporter of 2/3 of the minerals that go into solar panel production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
